SiriusDecisions helps portfolio marketing leaders take a more strategic approach to launch. Our proprietary Strategic Launch Framework provides the key steps for delivering more efficient launches that target the right external and internal audiences – allowing you to reduce your time to market by as much as 78 percent.
How SiriusDecisions Helps
We bring a well-defined process to launch
Flexibility and scope of our PMM model
Clearly articulated roles and responsibilities
Changing mindsets by bringing a fresh perspective to marketing
We focus on what’s missing (gap analysis)
Key Issues
The need for a better launch strategy
Inconsistencies in product launches – e.g. templates and processes, synchronizing with corporate
Lack of clarity about roles and responsibilities and friction with product management
The need for alignment with different functions on a consistent approach
The need for streamlined, more-efficient processes
Marketing lacks a seat at the table
Success Stories
"The keys to our success were to quickly define a new launch process using the Strategic Launch Framework and to leverage templates for launch plans, checklists, roles and responsibilities, activities and deliverables."
Explore the Technologies and Services That Drive the B2B Revenue Engine
The SiriusDecisions B2B Technology Universe organizes technology and services around the disciplines of the revenue engine: marketing, sales and product. Our coverage is then further aligned to the priorities of our clients within those disciplines.
Bringing Offerings to Market
Explore the technology and services that SiriusDecisions recommends to enable you to solve for this specific priority.
Market and competitive intelligence – win/loss analysis
Conducts prospect interviews, identifies win or loss root causes, and makes recommendations to improve the win/loss ratio.
The SiriusDecisions Advantage
We focus on the audience, not the product. We steer clear of Pragmatic, which bypasses sales, needs upgrading and focuses on product management. It makes marketing tactical vs. strategic.
